AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 319
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11389 vs 10582

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 43.72 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 1,399 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3245 vs 3141
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.821 vs 31.301
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.297 vs 572.795
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 2.83
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.966 vs 26.388
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 4042
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2645 vs 2221
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 4042
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2645 vs 2221

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3141 3245
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	659 319
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11389 10582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.301 52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	572.795 793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.83 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.388 48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.706 163.204
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4042 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4042 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3359

Compare specifications (specs)