AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555X and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 3x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
  • Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12706 vs 6620
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 vs 246.614
  • Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 vs 1.888
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 vs 21.014
  • 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 vs 42.981
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 vs 2306
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2350 vs 1514
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3333
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 vs 2306
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2350 vs 1514
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3333
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 July 2018 vs 3 January 2017
Core clock speed 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 48
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 12706 vs 6620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 668.308 vs 246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.158 vs 1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 49.593 vs 21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 170.952 vs 42.981
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4093 vs 2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2350 vs 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4093 vs 2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2350 vs 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 vs 35.283
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.485 vs 35.283

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
12706
6620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
35.283
36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
668.308
246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.158
1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
49.593
21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
170.952
42.981
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4093
2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2350
1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4093
2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2350
1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3333
Name AMD Radeon Pro 555X Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Geekbench - OpenCL 12706 6620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 35.283 36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 668.308 246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.158 1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 49.593 21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 170.952 42.981
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4093 2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2350 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4093 2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2350 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3333
PassMark - G3D Mark 1358
PassMark - G2D Mark 338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 720

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 555X Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Generation 9.5
Code name Polaris 21 Kaby Lake GT3e
Launch date 16 July 2018 3 January 2017
Place in performance rating 964 1136
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 907 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 768 48
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 189 million
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5100 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync