AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555X and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12706 vs 6620
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 vs 246.614
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 vs 1.888
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 vs 21.014
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 vs 42.981
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 vs 2306
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2350 vs 1514
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3333
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 vs 2306
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2350 vs 1514
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 3 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 vs 6620 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 vs 246.614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 vs 1.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 vs 21.014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 vs 42.981 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 vs 2306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 vs 2306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 vs 35.283
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 vs 35.283 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 | 6620 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 36.485 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 246.614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 1.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 21.014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 42.981 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 2306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 2306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3333 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1358 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 3 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 964 | 1136 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |