AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon HD 8690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 528.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 984
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 5079
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 vs 1579
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2280 vs 1813
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3178
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 vs 1579
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2280 vs 1813
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3178
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 March 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops vs 528.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 984 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 vs 5079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 vs 1579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 vs 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 vs 1579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 vs 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3178 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8690M
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 724
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8690M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 984 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 768 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | 5079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 1579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 1579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3178 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon HD 8690M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | Sun |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 628 | 625 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 528.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | 16.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 560 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIFireGL V5600
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4
