AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 797 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 555
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15826 vs 12022
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 vs 24.986
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 2.362
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 189.085 vs 55.394

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

• Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 89.26 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
• Around 31% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1024
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 2,142 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3594 vs 3475
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 826.477 vs 614.695
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.269 vs 31.274
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6030 vs 4695
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3657 vs 2280
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6030 vs 4695
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3657 vs 2280

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3475 3594
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 555
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15826 12022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.388 24.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	614.695 826.477
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.837 2.362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.274 35.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.085 55.394
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4695 6030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280 3657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4695 6030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280 3657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3347

Compare specifications (specs)