AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 797 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 554
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 11889
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 vs 24.986
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 2.362
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 189.085 vs 55.394
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 8 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 554 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 vs 11889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 vs 24.986 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 vs 2.362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 vs 55.394 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 89.26 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
- Around 31% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1024
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 2,142 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3635 vs 3475
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 826.477 vs 614.695
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.269 vs 31.274
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6030 vs 4695
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3657 vs 2280
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6030 vs 4695
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3657 vs 2280
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 89.26 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 2,142 gflops vs 1,858 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3635 vs 3475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 826.477 vs 614.695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.269 vs 31.274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6030 vs 4695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3657 vs 2280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6030 vs 4695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3657 vs 2280 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 3635 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 554 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | 11889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 24.986 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 826.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 2.362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 35.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 55.394 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 6030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 3657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 6030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 3657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 8 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 628 | 629 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 2,142 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | 89.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |