Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon Pro 560
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon Pro 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 909.6x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.73 vs 41.388
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1136.391 vs 614.695
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.584 vs 3.837
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.715 vs 31.274
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.592 vs 189.085
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 4695
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 2280
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 4695
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 2280
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 18 April 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 vs 41.388 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1136.391 vs 614.695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.584 vs 3.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.715 vs 31.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.592 vs 189.085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 4695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 2280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 4695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 2280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- 3x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 2686
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 371
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15801 vs 12010
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 2686 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15801 vs 12010 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2686 | 3475 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 724 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12010 | 15801 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 | 41.388 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1136.391 | 614.695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.584 | 3.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.715 | 31.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.592 | 189.085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 4695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 2280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 4695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 2280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 626 | 628 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 907 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 58.05 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |