Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon Pro 560

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon Pro 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

AMD Radeon Pro 560

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
909.6x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 41.388
Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1138.276 vs 614.695
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.596 vs 3.837
Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.742 vs 31.274
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.829 vs 189.085
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 4695
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 2280
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 4695
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 2280

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Sep 2020 vs 18 April 2017
Texture fill rate	52.80 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	79.859 vs 41.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1138.276 vs 614.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.596 vs 3.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	61.742 vs 31.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	193.829 vs 189.085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5609 vs 4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708 vs 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5609 vs 4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708 vs 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3349

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

3x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 2688
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 353
Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16007 vs 12200

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	907 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	1024 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475 vs 2688
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 353
Geekbench - OpenCL	16007 vs 12200

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2688

3475

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

353

724

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12200

16007

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

79.859

41.388

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1138.276

614.695

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.596

3.837

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

61.742

31.274

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

193.829

189.085

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5609

4695

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

2280

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3349

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5609

4695

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

2280

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3349

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	AMD Radeon Pro 560
PassMark - G3D Mark	2688	3475
PassMark - G2D Mark	353	724
Geekbench - OpenCL	12200	16007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	79.859	41.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1138.276	614.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.596	3.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	61.742	31.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	193.829	189.085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5609	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708	2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5609	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708	2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3349

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	AMD Radeon Pro 560
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.0	GCN 4.0
Code name	Tiger Lake GT1	Polaris 21
Launch date	2 Sep 2020	18 April 2017
Place in performance rating	622	624
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz
Compute units	48
Core clock speed	300 MHz	907 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	211.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1.690 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	844.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	1024
Pixel fill rate	13.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	52.80 GTexel/s	58.05 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,858 gflops
Transistor count		3,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	IGP
Laptop size		large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		5080 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0