AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs ATI FirePro V9800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 2727
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 655
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 vs 9.718
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 0.867
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.274 vs 27.153
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 189.085 vs 118.756
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 9 September 2010 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 2727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 vs 9.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 vs 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 vs 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 vs 118.756 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 1600 vs 1024
- Around 46% better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.1 vs 614.695
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,858 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 738.1 vs 614.695 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | ATI FirePro V9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 2727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 655 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15805 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 9.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 738.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 118.756 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560 | ATI FirePro V9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Cypress |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 9 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 627 | 629 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |