AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs ATI FirePro V9800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 560

ATI FirePro V9800

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 7% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 850 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4600 MHz
Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 2727
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 655
4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 vs 9.718
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 0.867
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.274 vs 27.153
Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 189.085 vs 118.756

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 9 September 2010
Core clock speed	907 MHz vs 850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 4600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475 vs 2727
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	41.388 vs 9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.837 vs 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.274 vs 27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	189.085 vs 118.756

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800

Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
Around 56% higher pipelines: 1600 vs 1024
Around 46% better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.1 vs 614.695

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	68.0 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1600 vs 1024
Floating-point performance	2,720.0 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	738.1 vs 614.695

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3475

2727

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

655

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

41.388

9.718

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

614.695

738.1

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.837

0.867

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.274

27.153

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

189.085

118.756

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 560	ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475	2727
PassMark - G2D Mark	724	655
Geekbench - OpenCL	15796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	41.388	9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	614.695	738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.837	0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.274	27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	189.085	118.756
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 560	ATI FirePro V9800
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Polaris 21	Cypress
Launch date	18 April 2017	9 September 2010
Place in performance rating	628	630
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,499
Technical info
Core clock speed	907 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,858 gflops	2,720.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	1024	1600
Texture fill rate	58.05 GTexel / s	68.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	2,154 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s	147.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	4600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0