AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs ATI FirePro V9800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4600 MHz
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 2727
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 655
  • 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 vs 9.718
  • 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 0.867
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.274 vs 27.153
  • Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 189.085 vs 118.756
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 9 September 2010
Core clock speed 907 MHz vs 850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz vs 4600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3475 vs 2727
PassMark - G2D Mark 724 vs 655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.388 vs 9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.837 vs 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.274 vs 27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 189.085 vs 118.756

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800

  • Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
  • Around 56% higher pipelines: 1600 vs 1024
  • Around 46% better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.1 vs 614.695
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 68.0 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1600 vs 1024
Floating-point performance 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 738.1 vs 614.695

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3475
2727
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
724
655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
41.388
9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
614.695
738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.837
0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.274
27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
189.085
118.756
Name AMD Radeon Pro 560 ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G3D Mark 3475 2727
PassMark - G2D Mark 724 655
Geekbench - OpenCL 15805
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.388 9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 614.695 738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.837 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.274 27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 189.085 118.756
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 560 ATI FirePro V9800

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Polaris 21 Cypress
Launch date 18 April 2017 9 September 2010
Place in performance rating 627 629
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $3,499

Technical info

Core clock speed 907 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,858 gflops 2,720.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 1024 1600
Texture fill rate 58.05 GTexel / s 68.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 2,154 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 81.28 GB / s 147.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz 4600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0