AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 560

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 81% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 500 MHz
4.8x more texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
4.2x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1200 MHz
12.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 270
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 264

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 18 April 2006
Core clock speed	907 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate	58.05 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 24
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475 vs 270
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 264

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX

Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3475

270

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

264

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 560	NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475	270
PassMark - G2D Mark	724	264
Geekbench - OpenCL	15805
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	41.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	614.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	189.085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 560	NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Curie
Code name	Polaris 21	G71
Launch date	18 April 2017	18 April 2006
Place in performance rating	627	625
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	907 MHz	500 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,858 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	90 nm
Pipelines	1024	24
Texture fill rate	58.05 GTexel / s	12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	278 million
Boost clock speed		500 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	9.0c
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s	38.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	600 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	1200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	256
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0