AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 850 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 492

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M

• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 68 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 2,176 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3559 vs 3475
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17210 vs 15805
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.181 vs 41.388
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1121.002 vs 614.695
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.355 vs 3.837
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.527 vs 31.274
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 256.99 vs 189.085
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5094 vs 4695
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3692 vs 2280
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5094 vs 4695
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3692 vs 2280

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3475 3559
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 492
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15805 17210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.388 51.181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	614.695 1121.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.837 5.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.274 81.527
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.085 256.99
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4695 5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4695 5094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280 3692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3339

Compare specifications (specs)