AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 480.6x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3696
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3696
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3333
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 2 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 13x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63437 vs 48365
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 10296
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 10296
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63437 vs 48365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 vs 10296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 vs 10296 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48365 | 63437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3333 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9559 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 12 | GP102 |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 2 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 271 | 346 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1417 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 342.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 480.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 |