AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 480.6x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3696
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3696
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3333
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3333
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 Jun 2020 vs 2 August 2016
Texture fill rate 164.8 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

  • Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1030 MHz
  • Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 13x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
  • Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63437 vs 48365
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 10296
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 10296
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1531 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Pipelines 3584 vs 2560
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 10008 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 63437 vs 48365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10841 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10841 vs 10296

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
48365
63437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10296
10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10296
10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3696
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3333
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5600M NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Geekbench - OpenCL 48365 63437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10296 10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10296 10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3333
PassMark - G2D Mark 687
PassMark - G3D Mark 9313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 165.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2368.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 17.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 992.132
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 9559

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Pascal
Code name Navi 12 GP102
Launch date 15 Jun 2020 2 August 2016
Place in performance rating 271 346
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $1,199

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1030 MHz 1531 MHz
Compute units 40
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 1417 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.274 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 3584
Pixel fill rate 65.92 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 164.8 GTexel/s 342.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt
Floating-point performance 10,974 gflops
Transistor count 11,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 394.2 GB/s 480.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) 10008 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5X
Shared memory 0