AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 915 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 572
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17540 vs 14380
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 48.494 vs 41.336
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 62.405 vs 58.14
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 vs 156.419
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 27 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17540 vs 14380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 vs 41.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 vs 58.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 vs 156.419 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Around 31% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1024
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5209 vs 3678
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1351.496 vs 679.583
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.121 vs 3.96
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2495
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2495
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 1024 |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5209 vs 3678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 vs 679.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 vs 3.96 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | 5209 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17540 | 14380 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | 41.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | 1351.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | 4.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | 58.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | 156.419 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 27 September 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 543 | 574 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1344 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s |