AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 10.2x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 45.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3678 vs 81
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 294
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 9 August 2004 |
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 vs 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 294 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | 294 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17560 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Polaris 21 | NV43 A2 |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 9 August 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 551 | 550 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 146 million |
Texture fill rate | 2.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s |