AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 834 MHz
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 112.0 GTexel / s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 3,584 gflops vs 2,989 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 5460 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6337 vs 4916
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30219 vs 23542
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.958 vs 56.272
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1070.209 vs 778.867
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.94 vs 5.051
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 vs 65.535
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 436.958 vs 336.811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 715 vs 697

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6337 4916
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	697 715
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	30219 23542
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	74.958 56.272
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1070.209 778.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.94 5.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	89.457 65.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	436.958 336.811

Compare specifications (specs)