AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD Radeon R9 M470X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and AMD Radeon R9 M470X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 112.0 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
- Around 82% better floating-point performance: 3,584 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6337 vs 3244
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 426
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops vs 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 vs 3244 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 vs 426 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470X
- Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57109 vs 30298
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2340
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2340
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57109 vs 30298 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M470X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon R9 M470X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | 3244 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | 426 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30298 | 57109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon R9 M470X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Strato |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 421 | 461 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |