AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 816 vs 782
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12613 vs 11691
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 59733 vs 57152
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 14998
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 14998
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 14 March 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 vs 782 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 vs 11691 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 vs 57152 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 vs 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 vs 14998 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1499 MHz
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1499 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | 782 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | 11691 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 | 57152 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU116 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 14 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 173 | 240 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 8004 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |