AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 885 MHz
Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1499 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 811 vs 470
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12558 vs 11545

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	4 Aug 2020 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed	1243 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed	1499 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Pipelines	2560 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	811 vs 470
PassMark - G3D Mark	12558 vs 11545

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 130 Watt
9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75589 vs 59848
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 16433
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 16433
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3712
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3712
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3353
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3353

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt vs 130 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	75589 vs 59848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	17328 vs 16433
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	17328 vs 16433
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8912 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8912 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8055 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8055 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

811

470

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12558

11545

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

59848

75589

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16433

17328

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16433

17328

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3712

8912

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3712

8912

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

8055

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

8055

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark	811	470
PassMark - G3D Mark	12558	11545
Geekbench - OpenCL	59848	75589
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16433	17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16433	17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3712	8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3712	8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	8055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	8055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		22.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1001.496
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		6789

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 10	TU106
Launch date	4 Aug 2020	29 January 2019
Place in performance rating	183	179
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1499 MHz	1185 MHz
Compute units	40
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	885 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	479.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.35 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.675 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2304
Pixel fill rate	95.94 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	239.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	115 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	10,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB
Memory bandwidth	384 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6