AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1499 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 816 vs 569
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 vs 569 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 239.8 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13481 vs 12613
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85916 vs 59931
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 16433
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 16433
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 239.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13481 vs 12613 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85916 vs 59931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | 569 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | 13481 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 59931 | 85916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 179 | 178 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.59 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | 259.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
