AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 1050.1x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35084 vs 31080
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 15 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35084 vs 31080 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 11237
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 11237
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 vs 3458
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 vs 3458
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 11237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 11237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 vs 3458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 vs 3458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35084 | 31080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3674 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP106B |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 402 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 32 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 4,400 million |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |