AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 8993.6x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 20 April 2006 |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 96 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 96 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35084 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 242 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Polaris 20 | G71 |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 20 April 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 401 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Price now | $1,840.60 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 32 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 96 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 278 million |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 32.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1010 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |