AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 2304 vs 512
- 5.6x better floating-point performance: 6,175 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 1356x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 3337
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 515
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40265 vs 9306
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 109.521 vs 34.239
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1206.829 vs 639.427
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.88 vs 2.341
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 32
- 7.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.984 vs 69.814
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10113 vs 4498
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10113 vs 4498
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 vs 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 vs 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40265 vs 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 vs 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 vs 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 vs 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 vs 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 vs 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 vs 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 vs 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 2900
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 2900
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 2900 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 | 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40265 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2900 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2900 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 319 | 724 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 580 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
AMDFireStream 9170
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480M
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
AMDRadeon Pro 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
