AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 580X

NVIDIA Quadro M5000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 861 MHz
Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1038 MHz
1300.2x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35712 vs 29510
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3324
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3324
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 658

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 March 2019 vs 29 June 2015
Core clock speed	1100 MHz vs 861 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Texture fill rate	172.8 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 2048
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	35712 vs 29510
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3324
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3324
PassMark - G2D Mark	698 vs 658

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000

3.9x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3677 vs 3643
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3677 vs 3643
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9361 vs 7540

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3677 vs 3643
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3677 vs 3643
PassMark - G3D Mark	9361 vs 7540

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

35712

29510

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3643

3677

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3643

3677

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3324

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3324

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

698

658

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7540

9361

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 580X	NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Geekbench - OpenCL	35712	29510
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3643	3677
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3643	3677
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3324
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3324
PassMark - G2D Mark	698	658
PassMark - G3D Mark	7540	9361
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		99.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1183.119
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		53.364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		498.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		12524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		12524

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 580X	NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Polaris 20	GM204
Launch date	18 March 2019	29 June 2015
Place in performance rating	353	350
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,856.99
Price now		$1,498
Value for money (0-100)		7.47
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1038 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	861 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	345.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.530 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	2048
Pixel fill rate	38.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	172.8 GTexel/s	132.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	5700 million	5,200 million
Floating-point performance		4,252 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
SLI options		1
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Width		2" (5.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.3	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	217.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	256 Bit
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
3D Vision Pro
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management