AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 1300.2x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35543 vs 29518
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3324
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3324
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 660
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 29 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 861 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35543 vs 29518 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3324 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 660 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3677 vs 3643
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3677 vs 3643
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9410 vs 7540
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3677 vs 3643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3677 vs 3643 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9410 vs 7540 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35543 | 29518 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3324 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 660 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | 9410 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 99.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1183.119 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.364 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 498.551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GM204 |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 29 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 353 | 351 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,856.99 | |
Price now | $1,498 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 861 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 5,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |