AMD Radeon Pro Duo vs AMD FireStream 9370
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Duo and AMD FireStream 9370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 34.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 66.0 GTexel / s
- 5.1x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 1600
- 6.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 8,192 gflops vs 2,640.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8137 vs 2528
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 April 2016 vs 23 June 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 66.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 1600 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops vs 2,640.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8137 vs 2528 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9370
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 9.2x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 763 vs 745
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 763 vs 745 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | AMD FireStream 9370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8137 | 2528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 745 | 763 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53806 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo | AMD FireStream 9370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Capsaicin | Cypress |
Design | reference | |
Launch date | 26 April 2016 | 23 June 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 188 | 129 |
Price now | $849 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 66.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 2,154 million |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 277 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 3x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 4096 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |