AMD Radeon Pro Duo vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Duo and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 13.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 163.7 GTexel / s
• 2.9x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2816
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 8,192 gflops vs 5,238 gflops
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 750 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8164 vs 7580
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 765 vs 747
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56152 vs 43046
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 141.474 vs 106.585
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 1878.403
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.132 vs 9.751
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 vs 82.208
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 799.933 vs 511.115
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10141 vs 9143
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 32085
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10141 vs 9143
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 32085

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• 10x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3713
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3713

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8164 7580
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	765 747
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	56152 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.474 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3621.344 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.132 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	112.973 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.933 511.115
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10141 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38251 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10141 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38251 32085

Compare specifications (specs)