AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro SSG and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1304 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1442 MHz
• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3584
• Around 19% better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 10,329 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1430 MHz
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.59 vs 141.977
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1231.051 vs 1053.19
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 1855
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 1855

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100

• Around 49% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12663 vs 10498
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 601
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 356.902 vs 170.923
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4833.104 vs 3178.443
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.001 vs 16.732
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16640 vs 11029
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16640 vs 11029

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10498 12663
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	601 852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	170.923 356.902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3178.443 4833.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.732 25.001
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	173.59 141.977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1231.051 1053.19
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11029 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7766 1855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11029 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7766 1855

Compare specifications (specs)