NVIDIA TITAN V vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN V and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 465.6 GTexel / s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4096
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 14,899 gflops vs 12,288 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19748 vs 10972
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 906 vs 588
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 170.923
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3583.136 vs 3178.443
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 16.732
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1231.051
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15401 vs 11029
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15401 vs 11029

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG

• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1455 MHz
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1700 MHz
• 8.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.59 vs 20.669
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 3716
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 3716

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN V
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19748 10972
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	906 588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	270.561 170.923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3583.136 3178.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.857 16.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.669 173.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1504.373 1231.051
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15401 11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 7766
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15401 11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 7766

Compare specifications (specs)