AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs AMD Radeon R9 280

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU and AMD Radeon R9 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 933 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6937 vs 3698
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6937 vs 3698
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 August 2018 vs 4 March 2014
Boost clock speed 1000 MHz vs 933 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6937 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6937 vs 3698

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280

  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 300 Watt
  • Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5543 vs 2853
  • 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 667 vs 118
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7957 vs 7410
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7957 vs 7410
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2647
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2647
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt vs 300 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5543 vs 2853
PassMark - G2D Mark 667 vs 118
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7957 vs 7410
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7957 vs 7410
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3337 vs 2647
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3337 vs 2647

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2853
5543
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
118
667
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7410
7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7410
7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6937
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6937
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2647
3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2647
3337
Name AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU AMD Radeon R9 280
PassMark - G3D Mark 2853 5543
PassMark - G2D Mark 118 667
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7410 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7410 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6937 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6937 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2647 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2647 3337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 67.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1266.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.909
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 365.384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2009

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU AMD Radeon R9 280

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Vega 10 Tahiti
Launch date 26 August 2018 4 March 2014
Place in performance rating 426 427
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $279

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 933 MHz
Core clock speed 852 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 200 Watt
Transistor count 12,500 million 4,313 million
Floating-point performance 3,344 gflops
Pipelines 1792
Stream Processors 1792
Texture fill rate 104.5 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 275 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 1250 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 240 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 Bit
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)