AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro V520

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 3716
4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 3716
11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 3355
11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 3355

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Dec 2020 vs 23 July 2019
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	16807 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	16807 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	37642 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	37642 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 525
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19611 vs 12258
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 13220
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 13220
Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 117339 vs 61570

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1815 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Pipelines	3072 vs 2304
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	927 vs 525
PassMark - G3D Mark	19611 vs 12258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27179 vs 13220
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27179 vs 13220
Geekbench - OpenCL	117339 vs 61570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

525

927

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12258

19611

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13220

27179

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13220

27179

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16807

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16807

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37642

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37642

3355

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

61570

117339

Name	AMD Radeon Pro V520	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark	525	927
PassMark - G3D Mark	12258	19611
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13220	27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13220	27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	16807	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	16807	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	37642	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	37642	3355
Geekbench - OpenCL	61570	117339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		337.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4566.815
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		31.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		190.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1654.321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro V520	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 12	TU104
Launch date	1 Dec 2020	23 July 2019
Place in performance rating	61	109
Type	Server	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1600 MHz	1815 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	460.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	14.75 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.373 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	3072
Pixel fill rate	102.4 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	230.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	250 Watt
CUDA cores		3072
Maximum GPU temperature		89 C
Render output units		64
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
Display Port		1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm (10.5 inches)	10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt	650 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	6 pin + 8 pin
Width	111 mm (4.4 inches)	2-Slot
Height		4.556” (115.7mm)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s	496 GB/s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Technologies
Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready