AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 280 Watt
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 3707
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 3707
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 3353
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 4608 vs 2304
- 14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 525
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 12258
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 13220
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 13220
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 61570
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 2304 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 525 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 12258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 13220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 13220 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 61570 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 | 827 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12258 | 19986 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13220 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13220 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 | 3353 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61570 | 138072 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 12 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 December 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 61 | 90 |
| Type | Server | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.373 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 102.4 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 230.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro V520 with others
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
NVIDIAA40
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
