AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 444
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 15 August 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 vs 444 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- 5x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 8870
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 8870
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 vs 3586
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 vs 3586
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29491 vs 22421
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 4809
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 vs 3586 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29491 vs 22421 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 4809 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 | 29491 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 | 444 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 | 8161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3666 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 12 | GP106B |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 360 | 401 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |