NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 5x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7874 vs 4809
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39171 vs 22421
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 8870
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3586
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 8870
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3586
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 14 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7874 vs 4809 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39171 vs 22421 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3586 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 571
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 vs 571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7874 | 4809 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 571 | 585 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39171 | 22421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1315.075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 570.245 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU107 | Vega 12 |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 14 November 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Place in performance rating | 370 | 368 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2400 MHz |