AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 165 Watt
- 342.9x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3335
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3335
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 19 September 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 165 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1216 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9566 vs 8870
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9566 vs 8870
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3586
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3586
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34824 vs 22421
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 vs 585
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11100 vs 4809
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 3586 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34824 vs 22421 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 vs 585 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11100 vs 4809 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3335 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 | 34824 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 | 792 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 | 11100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 12 | GM204 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 366 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Price now | $605.06 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1216 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 165 Watt |
CUDA cores | 2048 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |