AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 23 November 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 723 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5150 vs 5020
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 554
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2045 vs 1842
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3144 vs 1663
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2045 vs 1842
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3144 vs 1663
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 vs 5020 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 vs 554 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26893 vs 26775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2045 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3144 vs 1663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2045 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3144 vs 1663 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5020 | 5150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 554 | 832 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26775 | 26893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 2045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | 3144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 2045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | 3144 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 820.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Vega 12 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 23 November 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 490 | 491 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory type | Not Listed | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |