AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5300 vs 4289
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 558 vs 381
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26839 vs 16429
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8311 vs 6337
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8311 vs 6337
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 11 January 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 vs 4289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 558 vs 381 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26839 vs 16429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 vs 6337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 vs 6337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1663
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1663
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1025 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1663 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 | 4289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 558 | 381 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26839 | 16429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | 6337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | 6337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 12 | GM206 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 472 | 469 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1025 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 55 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |