AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 705 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1475 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 1117.2x more texture fill rate: 377.6 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- 112.3x more memory clock speed: 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13123 vs 8124
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13123 vs 8124
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2413
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2413
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2226
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2226
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75438 vs 22732
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 948 vs 656
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14631 vs 8987
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 June 2017 vs 28 May 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 705 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1475 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 vs 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 vs 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2226 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75438 vs 22732 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 948 vs 656 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14631 vs 8987 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 4096
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 4096 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2226 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75438 | 22732 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 948 | 656 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14631 | 8987 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Vega 10 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 23 June 2017 | 28 May 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 172 | 395 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Price now | $1,580 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1475 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 755.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.17 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.08 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2x 2880 |
| Pixel fill rate | 94.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12500 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 5760 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
