AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon E8950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon E8950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 962.5x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 66.837
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 1369.722
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 6.633
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 65.836
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 326.391
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 29 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 66.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 1369.722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 6.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 65.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 326.391 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8950
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon E8950 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 66.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1369.722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 6.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 65.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 326.391 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon E8950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 29 September 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 732 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 192.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
