AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 834 MHz
- 1318.9x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 93.41 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 56.272
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 778.867
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 5.051
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 65.535
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 336.811
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 834 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 93.41 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 56.272 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 778.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 5.051 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 65.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 336.811 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5460 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1408 |
Memory clock speed | 5460 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 56.272 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 778.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 5.051 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 65.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 336.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 715 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4916 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Grenada |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 324 | 448 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 834 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 93.41 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,989 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 174.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 5460 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore |