AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 1843.8x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 7 GB/s
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 75.758
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 843.503
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 5.071
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 24.676
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 301.168
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3336
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 7 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3463
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 3463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 25 October 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $139 |
| Place in performance rating | 324 | 487 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,300 million |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 145 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 7 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIFireGL V7600
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDFireStream 9170
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
