AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1392 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 66.82 GTexel / s
- Environ 83% de pipelines plus haut: 1408 versus 768
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 250x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 7 GB/s
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 75.758
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 843.503
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 5.071
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 24.676
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 301.168
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 8496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3336
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 8496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 25 October 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1392 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 versus 768 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 7 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1392 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 3463
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1392 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 3463 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | GP107 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 25 October 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $139 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 324 | 487 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 3,300 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,138 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 145 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 7 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIFireGL V7600
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDFireStream 9170
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
