AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 641.7x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 1722.566
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 12.245
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 38.225
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 518.554
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 9834
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 9834
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 17 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 1722.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 12.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 38.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 518.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- 2.2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1408
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 vs 130.7
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 3463
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1408 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 vs 130.7 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 vs 3463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 157.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1722.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 12.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 38.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 518.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3343 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12868 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 834 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41155 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1229 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 17 March 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $999 |
| Place in performance rating | 333 | 332 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $1,999.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 192 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 8,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Width | Single-slot | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
IntelArc A370M
