AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1075 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 192 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 250x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 1722.566
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 12.245
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 38.225
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 518.554
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 9834
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 9834
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 17 March 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1075 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 192 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 1722.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 12.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 38.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 518.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 3072 versus 1408
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 versus 130.7
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 versus 3463
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 3072 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 versus 130.7 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 versus 3463 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 157.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1722.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 12.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 38.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 518.554 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 9834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3343 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12868 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 834 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41155 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1229 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | GM200 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 17 March 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 333 | 332 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $1,999.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 192 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 8,000 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 6,691 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
IntelArc A370M
