AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 64% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1408
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 12184
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3463
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3355
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 12184
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3463
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1408 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8029 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7476 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 14 | TU106 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 330 | 129 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |