AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 125 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 12184
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3463
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3355
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 12184
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3463
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 10384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 10130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 10384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 10130 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13637 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 612 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 80223 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7412 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU104B |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 324 | 107 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 80 W |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Width | Single-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
