AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500

  • Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Core clock speed 1187 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed 1400 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s
  • Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
  • Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 125 Watt
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 12184
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3463
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3355
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 12184
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3463
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3355
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020
Texture fill rate 172.8 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2560 vs 1408
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W vs 125 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20002 vs 12184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 10384 vs 3463
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10130 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20002 vs 12184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 10384 vs 3463
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10130 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12184
20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3463
10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
10130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12184
20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3463
10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
10130
Name AMD Radeon Pro W5500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 130.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2361.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 13.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 135.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 774.974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12184 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3463 10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 10130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12184 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3463 10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 10130
PassMark - G3D Mark 13930
PassMark - G2D Mark 632
Geekbench - OpenCL 68337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7353

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Turing
Code name Navi 14 TU104B
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 2 Apr 2020
Launch price (MSRP) $399
Place in performance rating 330 115
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1400 MHz 1080 MHz
Core clock speed 1187 MHz 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.942 TFLOPS 5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 2560
Pixel fill rate 44.80 GPixel/s 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 123.2 GTexel/s 172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 125 Watt 80 W
Transistor count 6400 million 13600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
Width Single-slot IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6