AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3290
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3290
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 130.7
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 2361.73
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 13.641
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 135.462
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 774.974
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 12184
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 vs 3463
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 12184
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 vs 3463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 6432.348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3290 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $9,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 103 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
