AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3290
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 13 August 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 130.7
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 2361.73
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 13.641
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 135.462
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 774.974
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 12184
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 versus 3463
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 12184
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 versus 3463
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 130.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 2361.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 13.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 135.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 774.974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 versus 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 12184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 versus 3463 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 6432.348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3290 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $9,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 103 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |