AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs AMD Radeon R9 370
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 975 MHz
- 1635.9x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 78 GTexel / s
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 6096
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 6096
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 78 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 vs 6096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 vs 6096 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 45402
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 vs 45402 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 6096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 6096 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45402 | 75346 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon R9 370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Trinidad |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 409 | 408 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 78 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 221 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 5600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
ATIFireGL V8650
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GTX
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro S7000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDRadeon R9 370
