AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 975 MHz
  • Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1051 MHz
  • 1363.2x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 93.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3685
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3685
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3339
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3339
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 9399
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 9399
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45724 vs 22089
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 975 MHz
Boost clock speed 1450 MHz vs 1051 MHz
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s vs 93.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9943 vs 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9943 vs 9399
Geekbench - OpenCL 45724 vs 22089

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

  • Around 9% higher pipelines: 1,536 vs 1408
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Pipelines 1,536 vs 1408
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
9399
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
45724
22089
Name AMD Radeon Pro W5500M NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9943 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9943 9399
Geekbench - OpenCL 45724 22089
PassMark - G3D Mark 6926
PassMark - G2D Mark 478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 366.321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Navi 14 GM204
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 18 August 2015
Place in performance rating 400 449
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1450 MHz 1051 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.083 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 1,536
Pixel fill rate 46.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s 93.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 5,200 million
Floating-point performance 2,995 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 160 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus