AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 1319.6x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 1750x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3340
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 729 vs 603
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3340 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 vs 603 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 7351
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 7351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3340 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 | 603 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 | 10465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47397 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5529 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP104B |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 319 | 321 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |