AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1676
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1676
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 5 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1676 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 904 vs 729
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9340 vs 7351
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 vs 729 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9340 vs 7351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1676 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 | 904 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 | 9340 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GP106 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 10 June 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 319 | 320 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 119.4 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | 59.72 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 59.72 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 4400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 201 mm (7.9") |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 160 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2200
