AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 3003x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 729 vs 435
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7351 vs 3597
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 vs 435 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 vs 3597 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 205 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3721
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3721
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3360
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 24690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 | 435 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 | 3597 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22044 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.199 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1284.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.881 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 312.822 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6508 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6508 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Amethyst |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 319 | 316 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |