AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 908 vs 807
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14796 vs 12906
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70263 vs 60872
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 22 February 2019 |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 vs 807 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14796 vs 12906 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70263 vs 60872 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 11065
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 11065
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 11065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 | 807 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14796 | 12906 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70263 | 60872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 16952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6273 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 22 February 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $279 |
| Place in performance rating | 209 | 210 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 229 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDFirePro W9100
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
