AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 716
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 vs 15835
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 716 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 vs 15835 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 205 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 43810
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 16573
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 16573
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 43810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 16573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 16573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 105171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 716 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 15835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 157 | 156 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |